Showing posts with label Individual Mandate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Individual Mandate. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Romney Spokeswoman Defends Massachusetts' Individual Mandate



SAUL: To that point, you know, if people had been in Massachusetts under Governor Romney’s health care plan, they would have had health care. There are a lot of people losing their jobs and their health care in President Obama’s economy.
RedState: The Moment All the Doubts About Romney Resurfaced on the Right
The "Read My Lips" Moment of Betrayal At Least Comes Before the Election This Time
  • Romney Campaign Completely Validates Obamacare While Defending Against Controversial Ad
  • - Mediaite
  • Romney Spokesperson: Priorities USA Ad Subject Would Have Had Health Care Under Romneycare
  • - Mediaite
  • Romney Camp Touts Romneycare When Blasting Priorities USA Ad 
  • - National Review
  • David Frum: Romneycare Really is the Answer 
  • - The Daily Beast
  • Conservatives Are Saying This Could Have Been The Moment Mitt Romney Lost The Election 
  • - Business Insider
  • Romney Spokesperson Touts Massachusetts’ Individual Mandate
  • - Think Progress
  • Romney spokeswoman uses Mass. health law to respond to Priorities USA ad
  • - Politico
  • Romney: Sick People May Live, If They Move to Massachusetts
  • - New York

    Wednesday, July 04, 2012

    Mitt Romney Contradicts Own Campaign, Acknowledges Individual Mandate "Is a Tax"


    Related: The Daily Rundown: Interview with Romney Senior Adviser Eric Fehrnstrom

    Politico's Maggie Haberman ( @maggiepolitico ) tweets:
    Romney cleanup on Fehrnstrom reiterates Boston concern about the base, will raise q's about why Obamacare diff than Masscare, and...

    ...is unusual departure from where his longtime senior adviser was on something publicly
    BuzzFeed's Andrew Kaczynski ( ‏@BuzzFeedAndrew ) notes:
    In admitting the individual mandate is a tax, Romney admits he raised taxes in Massachusetts.
    Caroline Horn of CBS News tweets:
    Obama spox on Romney saying "it's a tax": "He threw his top aide Eric Fehrnstrom under the bus by changing his campaign's position."
    UPDATE: Wall Street Journal reporter Sara Murray tweets:
    "Of course, if that's what they say it is." Romney's ropeline response when @DanaBashCNN asks if health care penalty is a tax per SCOTUS.

    Politico's Alex Burns ( @aburnspolitico ) observes:
    Romney's position would be tougher to sustain if the WH weren't engaged in its own set of acrobatics on whether the mandate's a tax

    Or if, say, the president were delivering a detailed, consistent message on health care that would engage Romney in a fact-based debate
    AP: 'Obamacare's a tax,' Romney says, while maintaining the health care mandate he established in Mass. is not: http://apne.ws/NA7gsm

    Neil King of the Wall Street Journal tweets:
    So if it's a tax, can Romney still say he didn't raise taxes as Mass governor? Romneycare garnered $20 million in taxes last year.
    Wall Street Journal: Romney's Tax Confusion: The candidate's response on the ObamaCare mandate reveals larger campaign problems.

    The Boston Globe's Matt Viser: WSJ hits Romneys “insular staff” & “lame jujitsu spin.” Adds it “looks confused in addition to being politically dumb”

    WSJ: “For the sake of not abandoning his faulty healthcare legacy in MA, Romney is jeopardizing chance @ becoming Pres”

    Politico's Ben White: Wow. WSJ edit page rips Romney over shifting stance on Obamacare tax/non-tax

    WSJ: "tragedy is that for .. sake of not abandoning his faulty health-care legacy in Mass ... Romney is jeopardizing .. chance at [winning]

    More from WSJ bazooka editorial: "[T]he [Romney] campaign looks confused in addition to being politically dumb."

    beating the horse here, but that WSJ edit is a ballistic missile aimed right at boston and it captures lot of c-suite anger

    Roger Simon: Romney shakes the Etch A Sketch and decides health care mandate is a tax.

    First Murdoch attacks Mitt & then the WSJ attacks him. Next: Somebody will bug his jet ski.

    Jim Manley: As a general rule, The wsj editorial writers are unusually skilled prevaricators, but damn, the piece on the romney campaign is BRUTAL

    Zeke Miller: WSJ ed: " the rich man obliged by vacationing this week at his lake-side home with a jet-ski cameo."

    WSJ: Romney promised Republicans he was the best man to make the case against President Obama...So far Mr. Romney is letting them down.

    OUCH: WSJ on Romney: " the campaign looks confused in addition to being politically dumb."

    WSJ ed board says @ericfehrn's MSNBC interview may be a turning point in this campaign. I think this editorial might be a bigger one...

    Monday, July 02, 2012

    Poll Watch: CNN/ORC Survey on ObamaCare and the Supreme Court

    CNN/ORC Poll on ObamaCare and the Supreme Court

    Favorable / Unfavorable {Net}

    Among Registered Voters
    • Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts 42% / 25% {+17%}
    Among Democrats
    • Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts 51% / 12% {+39%}
    Among Republicans
    • Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts 30% / 38% {-8%}
      Among Independents 
      • Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts 39% / 26% {+13%}
      Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Supreme Court is handling its job?

      Among Registered Voters
      • Approve 52%
      • Disapprove 45%
      Among Democrats
      • Approve 73%
      • Disapprove 24%
      Among Republicans
      • Approve 31%
      • Disapprove 65%
      Among Independents 
      • Approve 53%
      • Disapprove 43%
      In general, do you think the current Supreme Court is too liberal, too conservative, or just about right?

      Among Registered Voters
      • Too liberal 32%
      • Too conservative 23%
      • About right 44%
      Among Democrats
      • Too liberal 6%
      • Too conservative 35%
      • About right 58%
      Among Republicans
      • Too liberal 59%
      • Too conservative 7%
      • About right 32%
      Among Independents 
      • Too liberal 31%
      • Too conservative 22%
      • About right 45%
      If you had to choose, would you rather see Congress vote to repeal all of the provisions in the health care law or would you rather see Congress vote to leave in place all the provisions in the health care law?

      Among Registered Voters
      • Repeal all provisions 52%
      • Keep all provisions in place 46%
      Among Democrats
      • Repeal all provisions 16%
      • Keep all provisions in place 80%
      Among Republicans
      • Repeal all provisions 86%
      • Keep all provisions in place 13%
      Among Independents 
      • Repeal all provisions 56%
      • Keep all provisions in place 42%
      Now thinking specifically about the provision in that law that will require all Americans who do not have health insurance to get it, do you favor or oppose that provision?

      Among Registered Voters
      • Favor 47%
      • Oppose 51%
      Among Democrats
      • Favor 79%
      • Oppose 20%
      Among Republicans
      • Favor 17%
      • Oppose 82%
      Among Independents 
      • Favor 44%
      • Oppose 55%
      Regardless of how you feel about that provision, do you consider it a tax on Americans, or don't you feel that way?

      Among Registered Voters
      • Yes, is a tax 60%
      • No, not a tax 39%
      Among Democrats
      • Yes, is a tax 41%
      • No, not a tax 58%
      Among Republicans
      • Yes, is a tax 83%
      • No, not a tax 15%
      Among Independents 
      • Yes, is a tax 59%
      • No, not a tax 39%
        The Supreme Court's decision also affected Medicaid, the federal health program for the poor. The decision gives state governments the option not to expand their Medicaid programs without losing funding for their existing Medicaid system. Based on what you have read or heard about this, do you agree or disagree with this decision?

        Among Registered Voters
        • Agree 51%
        • Disagree 42%
        Among Democrats
        • Agree 54%
        • Disagree 40%
        Among Republicans
        • Agree 48%
        • Disagree 43%
        Among Independents 
        • Agree 47%
        • Disagree 47%
          Survey of 1,517 adults, including a subsample of 1,390 registered voters, was conducted June 28 - July 1, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 2.5 percentage points.

          The Daily Rundown: Interview with Romney Senior Adviser Eric Fehrnstrom



          Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

          Sunday, July 01, 2012

          This Week Roundtable

          This Week: Interview with White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew

          Nancy Pelosi on Meet the Press

          Mitch McConnell on Fox News Sunday

          Fox News Sunday: Interview with White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew

          Martin O'Malley & Scott Walker on Face the Nation

          House Speaker John Boehner on Face the Nation

          Face the Nation Roundtable

          This Week: Interview with Paul Ryan

          Meet the Press Roundtable

          Bobby Jindal and Howard Dean on Meet the Press

          CNN State of the Union: Interview with White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew (Part 1)

          Thursday, June 28, 2012

          Poll Watch: SurveyUSA California Survey on Supreme Court Decision on the Affordable Care Act

          SurveyUSA California Poll on Supreme Court Ruling on ObamaCare

          The Supreme Court has ruled that the key provisions of the health care reform law are constitutional. Do you agree with the Supreme Court decision? Disagree with the decision? Or do you not know enough to say?
          • Agree 44%
          • Disagree 45%
          • Don't know enough 11%
          Democrats
          • Agree 72%
          • Disagree 19%
          • Don't know enough 9%
          Republicans
          • Agree 20%
          • Disagree 71%
          • Don't know enough 9%
          Independents
          • Agree 36%
          • Disagree 48%
          • Don't know enough 16%
          Men
          • Agree 46%
          • Disagree 49%
          • Don't know enough 5%
          Women
          • Agree 41%
          • Disagree 40%
          • Don't know enough 19%
          As a result of this Supreme Court ruling, will the health care you personally receive, get better, get worse, or stay the same?
          • Get better 23%
          • Get worse 38%
          • Stay about the same 34%
          Democrats
          • Get better 33%
          • Get worse 20%
          • Stay about the same 45%
          Republicans
          • Get better 9%
          • Get worse 55%
          • Stay about the same 30%
          Independents
          • Get better 27%
          • Get worse 40%
          • Stay about the same 27%
          Men
          • Get better 27%
          • Get worse 39%
          • Stay about the same 30%
          Women
          • Get better 18%
          • Get worse 36%
          • Stay about the same 40%
          As a result of this Supreme Court ruling, will the health care you personally receive become more expensive, become less expensive, or stay the same?
          • More expensive 48%
          • Less expensive 16%
          • Stay the same 31%
          Democrats
          • More expensive 25%
          • Less expensive 22%
          • Stay the same 47%
          Republicans
          • More expensive 69%
          • Less expensive 3%
          • Stay the same 21%
          Independents
          • More expensive 53%
          • Less expensive 21%
          • Stay the same 22%
          Men
          • More expensive 51%
          • Less expensive 18%
          • Stay the same 26%
          Women
          • More expensive 44%
          • Less expensive 12%
          • Stay the same 38%
          Regardless of how you may feel about the Supreme Court decision, should everyone in the United States be required to have health insurance? Or should every individual be allowed to choose whether to have health insurance?
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 43%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 52%
          Democrats
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 67%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 25%
          Republicans
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 15%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 81%
          Independents
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 43%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 55%
          Men
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 41%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 54%
          Women
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 46%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 49%
          Regardless of how you may feel about the Supreme Court decision, should insurance companies be able to deny health insurance to those who have pre-existing medical conditions? Or should insurance companies be required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance?
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 11%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 84%
          Democrats
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 6%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 91%
          Republicans
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 13%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 81%
          Independents
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 17%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 79%
          Men
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 13%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 83%
          Women
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 9%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 85%
          Survey of 514 adults following news stories about the Supreme Court decision on health care was conducted June 28, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 4.4 percentage points. Party ID: 37% Democrat; 32% Republican; 28% Independent. Ideology: 41% Moderate; 33% Conservative; 21% Liberal.

          Poll Watch: SurveyUSA Florida Survey on Supreme Court Decision on the Affordable Care Act

          SurveyUSA Florida Poll on Supreme Court Ruling on ObamaCare

          The Supreme Court has ruled that the key provisions of the health care reform law are constitutional. Do you agree with the Supreme Court decision? Disagree with the decision? Or do you not know enough to say?
          • Agree 39%
          • Disagree 50%
          • Don't know enough 11%
          Democrats
          • Agree 64%
          • Disagree 22%
          • Don't know enough 14%
          Republicans
          • Agree 14%
          • Disagree 79%
          • Don't know enough 7%
          Independents
          • Agree 36%
          • Disagree 54%
          • Don't know enough 10%
          Men
          • Agree 41%
          • Disagree 55%
          • Don't know enough 4%
          Women
          • Agree 38%
          • Disagree 46%
          • Don't know enough 17%
          As a result of this Supreme Court ruling, will the health care you personally receive, get better, get worse, or stay the same?
          • Get better 20%
          • Get worse 47%
          • Stay about the same 27%
          Democrats
          • Get better 34%
          • Get worse 21%
          • Stay about the same 33%
          Republicans
          • Get better 6%
          • Get worse 74%
          • Stay about the same 19%
          Independents
          • Get better 18%
          • Get worse 48%
          • Stay about the same 29%
          Men
          • Get better 18%
          • Get worse 52%
          • Stay about the same 24%
          Women
          • Get better 22%
          • Get worse 42%
          • Stay about the same 30%
          As a result of this Supreme Court ruling, will the health care you personally receive become more expensive, become less expensive, or stay the same?
          • More expensive 51%
          • Less expensive 12%
          • Stay the same 31%
          Democrats
          • More expensive 30%
          • Less expensive 15%
          • Stay the same 49%
          Republicans
          • More expensive 75%
          • Less expensive 7%
          • Stay the same 13%
          Independents
          • More expensive 50%
          • Less expensive 15%
          • Stay the same 29%
          Men
          • More expensive 52%
          • Less expensive 16%
          • Stay the same 26%
          Women
          • More expensive 50%
          • Less expensive 8%
          • Stay the same 36%
          Regardless of how you may feel about the Supreme Court decision, should everyone in the United States be required to have health insurance? Or should every individual be allowed to choose whether to have health insurance?
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 36%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 61%
          Democrats
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 59%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 39%
          Republicans
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 13%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 86%
          Independents
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 35%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 58%
          Moderates
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 47%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 50%
          Men
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 37%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 61%
          Women
          • Everyone should be required to have insurance 36%
          • Every individual should be allowed to choose 60%
          Regardless of how you may feel about the Supreme Court decision, should insurance companies be able to deny health insurance to those who have pre-existing medical conditions? Or should insurance companies be required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance?
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 15%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 78%
          Democrats
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 6%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 85%
          Republicans
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 27%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 68%
          Independents
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 14%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 80%
          Men
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 21%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 76%
          Women
          • Able to deny those with pre-existing conditions 10%
          • Required to cover everyone who wants to buy insurance 80%
          Survey of 539 adults following news stories about the Supreme Court decision on health care was conducted June 28, 2012. The margin of error is +/- 4.3 percentage points. Party ID: 39% Democrat; 34% Republican; 27% Independent. Ideology: 41% Moderate; 38% Conservative; 18% Liberal.